Fujifilm XH2 vs. Fujifilm XH1
Comparison
change cameras »  

vs 


Fujifilm XH2  Fujifilm XH1  
check price »  check price » 
Megapixels
40.20
24.30
Max. image resolution
7728 x 5152
6000 x 4000
Sensor
Sensor type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
Sensor size comparison
Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera.
Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the
sensor, the better the image quality.
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older.
Learn more about sensor sizes »
Actual sensor size
Note: Actual size is set to screen → change »

vs 

1  :  1 
(ratio)  
Fujifilm XH2  Fujifilm XH1 
Surface area:
366.60 mm²  vs  366.60 mm² 
Difference: 0 mm² (0%)
XH2 and XH1 sensors are the same size.
Note: You are comparing cameras of different generations.
There is a 4 year gap between Fujifilm XH2 (2022) and Fujifilm XH1 (2018).
All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older.
Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel (photosite) to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range.
Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered.
The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions (more detail) for a given sensor size.
Relative pixel sizes:
vs
Pixel area difference: 5.93 µm² (65%)
A pixel on Fujifilm XH1 sensor is approx. 65% bigger than a pixel on Fujifilm XH2.
Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one
square cm of the sensor.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels.
To learn about the accuracy of these numbers,
click here.
Specs
Fujifilm XH2
Fujifilm XH1
Total megapixels
Effective megapixels
40.20
24.30
Optical zoom
Digital zoom
Yes
ISO sensitivity
Auto, 12512800 (extends to 6451200)
Auto, 20012800 (extends to 10051200)
RAW
Manual focus
Normal focus range
Macro focus range
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
Aperture priority
Yes
Yes
Max. aperture
Metering
Multi, Centerweighted, Average, Spot
Multi, Centerweighted, Spot
Exposure compensation
±5 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
±5 EV (in 1/3 EV steps)
Shutter priority
Yes
Yes
Min. shutter speed
30 sec
30 sec
Max. shutter speed
1/180000 sec
1/8000 sec
Builtin flash
External flash
Viewfinder
Electronic
Electronic
White balance presets
7
7
Screen size
3"
3"
Screen resolution
1,620,000 dots
1,040,000 dots
Video capture
Max. video resolution
7680x4320 (30p/25p/24p/23.98p)
4096x2160 (24p)
Storage types
SD/SDHC/SDXC, UHSI/II, CFexpress Type B
SD/SDHC/SDXC
USB
USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
HDMI
Wireless
GPS
Battery
NPW235 lithiumion battery
NPW126S lithiumion battery
Weight
660 g
673 g
Dimensions
136.3 x 92.9 x 84.6 mm
139.8 x 97.3 x 85.5 mm
Year
2022
2018
Choose cameras to compare
Popular comparisons:
 Fujifilm XH2 vs. Fujifilm XT5
 Fujifilm XH2 vs. Fujifilm XH2S
 Fujifilm XH2 vs. Nikon Z7 II
 Fujifilm XH2 vs. Panasonic Lumix DCG90
 Fujifilm XH2 vs. Panasonic Lumix DCGH6
 Fujifilm XH2 vs. Nikon D850
 Fujifilm XH2 vs. Sony A7 IV
 Fujifilm XH2 vs. Nikon Z6 II
 Fujifilm XH2 vs. Sony a7R V
 Fujifilm XH2 vs. Fujifilm XH1
 Fujifilm XH2 vs. Canon EOS R5
Diagonal
Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem:
where w = sensor width and h = sensor height
Diagonal = √  w² + h² 
Fujifilm XH2 diagonal
w = 23.50 mm
h = 15.60 mm
h = 15.60 mm
Diagonal = √  23.50² + 15.60²  = 28.21 mm 
Fujifilm XH1 diagonal
w = 23.50 mm
h = 15.60 mm
h = 15.60 mm
Diagonal = √  23.50² + 15.60²  = 28.21 mm 
Surface area
Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor.
XH2 sensor area
Width = 23.50 mm
Height = 15.60 mm
Surface area = 23.50 × 15.60 = 366.60 mm²
Height = 15.60 mm
Surface area = 23.50 × 15.60 = 366.60 mm²
XH1 sensor area
Width = 23.50 mm
Height = 15.60 mm
Surface area = 23.50 × 15.60 = 366.60 mm²
Height = 15.60 mm
Surface area = 23.50 × 15.60 = 366.60 mm²
Pixel pitch
Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the
next measured in micrometers (µm). It can be calculated with the following formula:
Pixel pitch =  sensor width in mm  × 1000 
sensor resolution width in pixels 
XH2 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 23.50 mm
Sensor resolution width = 7792 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 7792 pixels
Pixel pitch =  23.50  × 1000  = 3.02 µm 
7792 
XH1 pixel pitch
Sensor width = 23.50 mm
Sensor resolution width = 6058 pixels
Sensor resolution width = 6058 pixels
Pixel pitch =  23.50  × 1000  = 3.88 µm 
6058 
Pixel area
The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch:
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area = pixel pitch²
You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels:
Pixel area =  sensor surface area in mm² 
effective megapixels 
XH2 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 3.02 µm
Pixel area = 3.02² = 9.12 µm²
Pixel area = 3.02² = 9.12 µm²
XH1 pixel area
Pixel pitch = 3.88 µm
Pixel area = 3.88² = 15.05 µm²
Pixel area = 3.88² = 15.05 µm²
Pixel density
Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula:
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density = (  sensor resolution width in pixels  )² / 1000000 
sensor width in cm 
One could also use this formula:
Pixel density =  effective megapixels × 1000000  / 10000 
sensor surface area in mm² 
XH2 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 7792 pixels
Sensor width = 2.35 cm
Pixel density = (7792 / 2.35)² / 1000000 = 10.99 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 2.35 cm
Pixel density = (7792 / 2.35)² / 1000000 = 10.99 MP/cm²
XH1 pixel density
Sensor resolution width = 6058 pixels
Sensor width = 2.35 cm
Pixel density = (6058 / 2.35)² / 1000000 = 6.65 MP/cm²
Sensor width = 2.35 cm
Pixel density = (6058 / 2.35)² / 1000000 = 6.65 MP/cm²
Sensor resolution
Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher
than maximum (not interpolated) image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications.
Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula.
For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages.
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio:
Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter (aspect ratio). It's usually 1.33 (4:3) or 1.5 (3:2), but not always.
2. With the ratio (r) known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels:
(X × r) × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → 

Resolution horizontal: X × r
Resolution vertical: X
XH2 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 23.50 mm
Sensor height = 15.60 mm
Effective megapixels = 40.20
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 5160 × 1.51 = 7792
Resolution vertical: X = 5160
Sensor resolution = 7792 x 5160
Sensor height = 15.60 mm
Effective megapixels = 40.20
r = 23.50/15.60 = 1.51 

Resolution vertical: X = 5160
Sensor resolution = 7792 x 5160
XH1 sensor resolution
Sensor width = 23.50 mm
Sensor height = 15.60 mm
Effective megapixels = 24.30
Resolution horizontal: X × r = 4012 × 1.51 = 6058
Resolution vertical: X = 4012
Sensor resolution = 6058 x 4012
Sensor height = 15.60 mm
Effective megapixels = 24.30
r = 23.50/15.60 = 1.51 

Resolution vertical: X = 4012
Sensor resolution = 6058 x 4012
Crop factor
Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal
of 35 mm film (43.27 mm) with the diagonal of the sensor.
Crop factor =  43.27 mm 
sensor diagonal in mm 
XH2 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 28.21 mm
Crop factor =  43.27  = 1.53 
28.21 
XH1 crop factor
Sensor diagonal in mm = 28.21 mm
Crop factor =  43.27  = 1.53 
28.21 
35 mm equivalent aperture
Equivalent aperture (in 135 film terms) is calculated by multiplying lens aperture
with crop factor (a.k.a. focal length multiplier).
XH2 equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Fujifilm XH2, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Fujifilm XH2 is 1.53
Crop factor for Fujifilm XH2 is 1.53
XH1 equivalent aperture
Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for
fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for
Fujifilm XH1, take the aperture of the lens
you're using and multiply it with crop factor.
Crop factor for Fujifilm XH1 is 1.53
Crop factor for Fujifilm XH1 is 1.53
Enter your screen size (diagonal)
My screen size is
inches
Actual size is currently adjusted to screen.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.