Let’s begin today by stepping back in time to the dawn of the PC era (and the early days of this blog): 1978. The debut of Scott Adams’s Adventureland that year also marked the debut of the world’s first reuseable adventure-gaming engine, in which a single interpreter program runs a variety of different games by being fed different databases. And reuse the system Adams did, to the tune of six titles released in 1979 alone, while the rest of the computing world set to work figuring out how the system was put together. Two TRS-80 hackers, Allan Moluf and Bruce Hanson, were particularly dedicated. By January of 1980 they were distributing to select buddies a text file which described Adams’s database format in careful detail along with a set of utilities for examining existing games. By 1981 they had written the Adventure Executor, a new interpreter capable of playing any of Adams’s games; just provide it with the database file. And their efforts culminated at the end of that year in The Adventure System, a complete authoring package that let you create new games in the Scott Adams database format as well as dissect existing ones to your heart’s content for the low, low price of $40.
For various reasons, starting with the TRS-80 platform on which it ran being rather isolated from the rest of the computing world and ending with the small print that demanded a $200 license fee to use The Adventure System to create commercial adventures, it never caught on. Moluf and Hanson, however, were not alone in their inquisitiveness. Others across the pond were also looking hard at the Scott Adams games. Their efforts would have much more lasting repercussions.
During the earliest days of personal computing in Britain, when practitioners consisted of just a few tens of thousands of soldering-iron-wielding dreamers, one Ken Reed managed to get hold of an imported TRS-80 along with some of the Scott Adams games. Like Moluf and Hanson, Reed was as interested in figuring out how they worked as he was in playing them. He doggedly pulled the system apart, and published his findings in the August 1980 Practical Computing magazine, the nearest equivalent British hobbyists had to the American hackers’ favorite Byte. Reed’s article wasn’t so obviously practical as the work of Moluf and Hanson. It didn’t provide exact specifications of the Scott Adams database format, nor tools for hacking on the games, nor even a complete original game or a complete interpreter for running a game. No, it provided something that in the long run would prove to be much more empowering: a detailed proposal for making an engine similar to Adams’s for yourself, complete with pseudo-code listings that could be applied to virtually any platform you had handy and knew how to program.
The impact the article had on British gaming over the following decade can hardly be overstated. Richard Turner and Chris Thornton, two university students, formed Artic Computing and used the article as the basis for their own line of Adams-like adventures that began with Planet of Death, likely the first commercial text adventure written in Britain, in June of 1981. Many variations on the article’s approach were soon appearing in other games. But its most important descendent was not a standalone game at all but a complete adventure-writing system similar in spirit to The Adventure System. This system, however, got several things right that the older system had gotten so wrong. It was called The Quill, and it was the brainchild of a Welshman in his late twenties named Graeme Yeandle.
When Yeandle analyzed those early Artic games and found them to be put together in a way suspiciously similar to Reed’s system, his first reaction was to think that he could do that just as well as Turner and Thornton. He went so far as to write to Artic to offer his services, but never got a reply to his letter. Whilst messing about with adventure-game databases and interpreters on his new Spectrum, he noticed an advertisement for a local publisher called Gilsoft, located just twelve miles from his Cardiff home — in fact, in the town where he had been born, Barry. He decided to pay their office a visit. On doing so, he learned that “they” were a single teenager named Tim Gilberts, and the “office” was Gilberts’s bedroom in the family home. Still, Gilberts was bright and ambitious, and the two hit it off. (Gilberts thought Yeandle “looked just like Clive Sinclair.”) When Yeandle told him about his adventure-game experiments, Gilberts encouraged him to make a real game for him to market. He ended up writing two, Time-Line and Magic Castle, which Gilberts sold through modest classified ads in the magazines for £5 each (the former, the smaller and simpler of the pair, as the companion to another game on the same tape).
About this time Yeandle realized, like many a programmer before him, that he could save a great deal of time in the long run if he spent some time now improving his development tools. While he was using a variation of the design scheme from Reed’s article, he was still constructing the database files laboriously by hand. He discussed with Gilberts his idea for a menu-driven data-entry system to automate the process. If it worked out it could become a sort of house adventure-authoring system which Gilberts could share with other prospective authors. Gilberts enthusiastically agreed, and Yeandle spent most of his nights and weekends during 1983 — this was still very much a sideline; he was employed full-time as a systems analyst — working on what would become The Quill. As the program grew more refined, Gilberts made a new proposal: instead of just using it in-house to make more adventures, why not sell it as a product in its own right, and open adventure authorship to anyone with a Speccy? And so was the adventure-game scene in Britain changed forever.
The Quill was greeted rapturously when it debuted just in time for the 1983 Christmas season. Micro-Adventurer magazine, which appropriately enough debuted at almost the same instant, called it a “revolution” in their very first issue: “Once in a while, a product comes along to revolutionize the whole microcomputer scene. The Quill is one such, and will change the face of the microcomputer adventure.” The Quill sold for just £15, and — and this is absolutely key to everything that followed — Gilsoft asked for no cash royalty for commercial works created with it, only that you insert a little “Made with The Quill!” blurb somewhere in the final work. Most other commercial systems for creating adventure and CRPG games, both before and after The Quill, didn’t offer such convenient terms, sharply limiting their appeal.
Sales were so brisk that Gilsoft soon gave up bothering to sell much of anything else; Gilberts was more than content to run the house that The Quill had built. Within weeks of its release so-called “Quilled adventures” were everywhere. By a year or so after that at least half of the adventures on the British market were Quilled — and that’s not even considering all of the less ambitious creators who just toyed around making games for family and friends, or released their games for free into public-domain channels.
About a year after The Quill, Gilsoft released The Illustrator, which let users add graphics to their games. It ended up selling almost as well as The Quill itself, and soon the requisite illustrated Quilled games were flooding the market. Gilsoft also funded ports of the system to most of the other viable British platforms, although sadly there was no easy way of moving an adventure database created on, say, a Spectrum to the BBC Micro or Commodore 64 short of reentering the whole by hand. As the system spread across Europe, now catching onto the PC revolution at last, countless souls used it to create games in their native languages.
Many of the earliest adventures in German, French, Dutch, Spanish, Italian, and the Scandinavian and Eastern European languages were Quilled. An attempt was also made to market The Quill in North America as The Adventure Writer, but without much success. It was entrusted there to a tiny company called Codewriter who lacked the resources to make it known and widely distributed in that more intimidating and elitist marketplace. And so, like so much else in the bifurcated computing culture of the 1980s, The Quill remained an exclusively European phenomenon.
Given the sorts of tools available to adventure writers today, The Quill is bound to seem underwhelming when we load it up on our Speccy emulator. One doesn’t really program a game at all using The Quill; one simply enters its data, menu by menu, filling in its rooms, its objects, its text. The logic available to the author is hard-coded into the interpreter, and not very complex at that. Nor is the process of creation a very intuitive one. It’s very difficult to get any sense of the big picture from all of these granular menu views. One is best served by planning one’s game out entirely on paper, using The Quill itself very much as the simple data-entry front-end it was originally conceived as. Even on those terms many trivial tasks are painfully tedious. The parser doesn’t really parse at all. There’s just a simple pattern matcher, which the author must micro-manage to the finest detail. One cannot simply define an object as takeable, for example, but must hand-enter the command that will allow it to be taken and dropped — and must do this separately for every single takeable object in the game. (Much of this tedium was removed in later versions of The Quill. See John Elliott’s comment below.)
Amidst all of the excitement following the system’s debut, some did voice a concern that it would lead to a rash of games that were not only primitive but all primitive in the same idiosyncratic way. Such fears were by no means entirely baseless. To some extent this is a problem with any authoring system; I wouldn’t be the first to note that Graham Nelson’s droll English diction has become the voice of contemporary interactive fiction thanks to the default messages of Inform, the most widely used development system today. The Quill’s limitations and lack of flexibility merely make it even more immediately obvious to any experienced adventurer that she is playing a Quilled game. That said, The Quill’s relatively long life gave plenty of people plenty of time to dig deep, to learn to push it and to learn to hack it. Much better, more complex works could be created with it than you might expect after a few minutes of fiddling around in its menus. Given the limitations of the 48 K Spectrum on which it runs, The Quill is put together in a very smart way. The average Quilled game is not only easier to create but more pleasant to play than (at the least) the average BASIC game. Tellingly, no one managed to come up with a system notably better for the Spectrum and equivalent machines despite the obvious commercial potential of such a beast.
Until Yeandle himself, that is: in late 1986 Gilsoft released his second-generation system, the Professional Adventure Writer (PAW). Arriving fairly late in the day for text adventures as a mainstream gaming staple, at least in Britain, it didn’t become quite the phenomenon that The Quill had been, but did power many more games throughout Europe well into the 1990s.
Indeed, it’s for that legacy of empowerment that PAW and (especially) The Quill deserve to be remembered today. It’s not that established software houses didn’t use The Quill; they did, to a surprising degree. Even Artic Computing, who had ignored Yeandle earlier, started using the Quill to create some of their new adventures. So did no less a light than Melbourne House of The Hobbit fame. But it’s mostly for all the little guys that The Quill seemed a minor miracle. North America had nothing comparable, and, presumably in consequence, far fewer independent voices making and selling text adventures. Europe, by contrast, was blessed in having not only The Quill but a marketplace willing to accept and buy works by the inspired amateurs who used it. Gilberts himself was well aware of the democratizing effect of The Quill:
Anyone who wants to write can produce a novel without technical knowledge. You may not create great art but there’s nothing to stop you trying. The Quill has opened up the same kind of opportunity to those who enjoy adventuring. We’ve tried to provide the computer equivalent of pen and paper.
No, most Quilled adventures are not great art or even great games, and they’re not likely to get as much attention on this blog as they may deserve given that I have so many other titles that qualify at least as the latter to sort through. Yet many are personal, idiosyncratic works of the sort gaming could always use more of. The best of them have a real writerly personality, another thing always in short supply in gaming fictions. Some of the most fun, and arguably the most culturally useful, Quilled adventures are the ones that satirize the solemn pretensions (especially of the high-fantasy stripe) of mainstream gaming culture then and now — titles like Bored of the Rings, The Boggit, Loads of Midnight, The Big Sleaze, or the immortal Dildo and the Dark Lord (did I mention that Quilled adventures were also more liable to traffic in sex than the titles from bigger publishers?).
The person with the most amazing Quill story of all might just be John Wilson, the founder of Zenobi Software. After publishing a few of his own Quilled games on the label in the mid-1980s and seeing them do fairly well, Wilson began soliciting games from outside authors. Even as the bigger publishers gradually got out of text adventures, Wilson built a successful if modest business out of selling the games via mail order, communicating with customers via a newsletter and whatever magazine advertising he could afford that month. Zenobi alone published almost 250 games, the vast majority of them created with The Quill or PAW, before hanging it up at last in the shockingly late year of 1997, by which time Gilsoft and the rest of the gaming milieu that had birthed Zenobi were long gone. All of which is enough to qualify Zenobi as the most prolific of commercial text-adventure publishers, the most long-lived, and the last to give it up, and all by a wide margin.
As you’ve probably gathered by now, The Quill and PAW were easily the most widely used adventure-creation systems of the 1980s. In the whole of computing history they’re rivaled only by Graham Nelson’s various Inform incarnations, which may have powered a comparable number of games by now but have taken some twenty years to do it. The architect of this creative explosion, Graeme Yeandle, never gave up his day job and never made as much money from it as you might expect. He recalls that in the wake of The Quill’s first gush of popularity in 1984 his royalty checks from Gilsoft actually amounted to more than his regular pay check — but “that didn’t last long.” The Quill was, even more so than most software, widely pirated. It’s safe to say that many of those Quilled games being sold in magazine adverts were themselves made with pirated copies; Gilsoft didn’t have any practical way to keep tabs on who had bought and who hadn’t. Even their modest request that users include a mention of The Quill in their Quilled games also went unenforced and widely ignored. And consumers will always outnumber creators in any time and place, meaning that even an insanely popular engine of creation like The Quill will never sell more than a fraction of the copies of a hit game. Gilsoft and Yeandle could probably have made considerably more money from The Quill by pricing it higher and being more aggressive about asserting their rights in various areas. But Gilsoft wasn’t Microsoft and young Gilberts was no Bill Gates; he was happy if the business just paid for “my beer and a car.” Anyway, The Quill was so successful precisely because it was so cheap and easy; changes to Gilsoft’s business model could likely only have diminished its impact.
As a consolation prize for fame and fortune, Yeandle and Gilberts got to see their creation getting used all around them, the most satisfying validation any programmer or engineer (or artist?) can enjoy. And they got to know that their work was allowing people to be creative in a medium that would otherwise have been inaccessible to them. At least in retrospect, that seems like more than enough.
(Much of this article was sourced from an old interview with Yeandle from The Solution Archive. Yeandle’s now-defunct home page was also invaluable. And see also the Gilsoft features in Sinclair User #28 and #37. I discovered much of Moluf and Hanson’s work while digging through old TRS-80 file archives, an often productive if exhausting way of researching.)
July 5, 2013 at 1:51 pm
Thanks for the kind words – much appreciated – and it just goes to show that once a Balrog steps on to a path it takes him a bloody long time to step off it again … if ever!!!
…… still walking to this day.
July 5, 2013 at 2:03 pm
You’re welcome! :)
July 5, 2013 at 6:31 pm
One cannot simply define an object as takeable, for example, but must hand-enter the command that will allow it to be taken and dropped — and must do this separately for every single takeable object in the game.
Later releases of the Quill (versions Cxx rather than Axx) improved on that by adding a word-to-object mapping table and providing default implementations for the get/drop/wear/remove actions, so that only special cases needed to be coded.
I think “figuring out who they worked” should read “…how they worked”.
July 6, 2013 at 7:35 am
Thanks for the correction and the additional information. I was playing with the earliest version of The Quill for this article. I hadn’t realized that the system was expanded that much in later versions.
July 5, 2013 at 7:35 pm
This was a great read, thanks Jimmy. I love these historical pieces from that time period.
July 5, 2013 at 8:17 pm
Good read – I used to load games into the Quill to find out how to solve the puzzles!
July 5, 2013 at 11:40 pm
This was an interesting introduction to “The Quill,” and I found myself comparing it to the written-in-BASIC text adventures (frameworks for which I remember seeing in computer magazines) that seemed to fill a perhaps not quite as important niche over here in North America.
As someone whose family got started with a TRS-80 Model I, though (and who still has an almost complete collection of 80 Microcomputing/80 Micro), I’m just a little uncertain about using “rather moribund” to describe the platform as early as 1982; I’ve heard its system-specific magazines were at their thickest in that year. Of course, I do feel fairly certain the world described in those system-specific magazines was more or less isolated from that of the more colourful computers by that point, and the whole “its third-party software could only be acquired by mail order from companies advertising in magazines Radio Shack didn’t sell” surely helped the numbers start fading a year or two later…
July 6, 2013 at 7:40 am
Fair enough. The TRS-80 was oddly isolated from everything else in computing; there was a TRS-80 software scene and a software scene for everything else, with little mixture. However, you’re right that the size of the 80 Microcomputing issues from this time alone — 400 pages or more every month! — hardly screams “moribund.” I made a slight edit to the article.
July 6, 2013 at 2:24 am
I believe the Quill came out sometime in September 1983.
The initial classified-style ads were underwhelming to put it mildly (it hadn’t yet been reviewed in any of the magazines), but for some reason I took a risk and bought a copy.
Best investment I ever made.
July 6, 2013 at 3:15 pm
Great to get the full story on The Quill. I was only vaguely aware of the rich history here. I hope you will also cover Welch & Malmberg’s AGT which was quite popular in the US.
July 6, 2013 at 3:54 pm
Yes, AGT is definitely on the agenda when we get there. The culture that surrounded it is quite interesting to me, and a number of real gems that are now sadly all but forgotten were created with the system.
July 6, 2013 at 11:12 pm
Tellingly, no one managed to come up with a system notably better for the Spectrum and equivalent machines despite the obvious commercial potential of such a beast.
What about GAC, the Graphic Adventure Creator, by Incentive Software (released a few months before PAW)? It wasn’t as successful as The Quill, but most reviews at the time considered it was more powerful (understandable, since The Quill was 3 years older).
July 7, 2013 at 1:44 am
I wrote 2 complete adventures using the Quill but for my third (and last that I myself authored) I switched to the newer GAC.
I don’t remember it being significantly more powerful than the Quill, although the integrated graphics capabilities certainly were a bonus. The Illustrator, if I recall was a separate utility you merged the data into your adventure at some point. Trivial these days but back in the cassette tape era rather fiddly and slow.
The GAC parser may have also allowed adverbs as well as the standard noun-verb. I think it also allowed you to create the adventure in a more human readable fashion- you wrote the actual verb-noun combination rather than the ID numbers of the words (verb 7 and noun 23 for instance).
But there was one big downside to GAC, and that was that the core editor took up far more memory than the Quill leaving a mere 25k for the actual adventure (the Quill left you 10k more). As the final game shipped without the editor, that space was left empty and wasted.
The Illustrator, I think, allowed you to use most of the room required by the editor for the final game. Then there was the Press which compressed the file into one that took up less room again.
For Cursed Be The City, I compromised by having a text only version on the b-side of the tape. Fortunately it is this version that survives in the World Of Spectrum archive. The graphical version’s text was so shortened to fit that it probably would have made even Scott Adams blush.
GAC was converted to the Atari ST (where it was called, not surprisingly STAC) but by then the 16 bit graphic capabilities of the new machines had all but killed of adventure games.
September 9, 2013 at 2:39 pm
I remember the G.A.C well on the ZX Spectrum. I never tried Quill or Paw but (apart from entering that text adventure written in Basic in “Input” magazine) it was pretty easy to use. The interpreter was mostly the verb/noun format, so the resulting adventures were pretty standard.
Of course the “Graphics” part of the G.A.C was pretty important, and like most adventures of the day graphics were really stored in a kind of vector format to save space and to this day I associate that style of picture – a stream of circles, lines, and squares followed by the sloooow colour fills – with text adventures!
July 7, 2013 at 9:37 am
I think the GAC bytecode is certainly more expressive than the Quill’s — it’s a stack-based language that allows various arithmetic operations, and also allows the author access to the numbers of the parsed verb and nouns. For example, in the GAC it’s a simple matter to write a generic EXAMINE command: IF (VERB 16 AND AVAI NO1) MESS (NO1 + 2) END. That isn’t possible in the Quill since it doesn’t have an equivalent of the NO1 opcode, and its MESSAGE opcode only takes a constant argument.
July 7, 2013 at 9:26 pm
Very true, the coding of input handling was far superior although in practice anything more complex than the standard verb-noun ended up making all but the most exceptional adventures annoying to play.
The memory issue was for me more of an issue, as I wanted to get away from the one-line location descriptions. True there was text compression built in but it still didn’t seem to allow for as big an adventure as even an uncompressed quill game. Of course, With the ease to add graphics, it seemed a waste not to (at the expense of more text space).
In hindsight, it could have been avoided simply by breaking any adventure down into several parts, either accessible from a save position or some password revealed at the end of the previous part. A technique I think Delta4 were one of the first to use.
But GAC was superior to the Quill I have to admit… But the Quill came along first and showed everyone how it’s done. And PAWS soon arrived, so powerful that I don’t think any adventure managed to use all its capabilities.
July 8, 2013 at 10:56 pm
Finally managed to read through all your posts. It’s been a slow, but fascinating journey. Thank you.
I really should’ve read the entirety of your blog more quickly. But then again now I actually have to wait for more articles :)
July 12, 2013 at 8:26 pm
Interestingly, that Moluf/Hanson text file you unearthed includes a few pieces of information that are missing from this more recent (and more freely circulated) description of the Adams adventure database format. For one thing, the last value in the trailer section is not merely an “unknown magic number” after all, but a checksum value based on a simple formula. (Although I can’t imagine how Moluf and Hanson, without any firsthand knowledge, were able to deduce what the formula was – other than through lots of tedious trial and error.)
OK, so this isn’t exactly the computer equivalent of the Dead Sea scrolls – but it does make me wonder what other “lost” knowledge might be lurking in those old file archives.
July 12, 2013 at 9:15 pm
Adams’s original interpreter was written in TRS-80 BASIC. Maybe it did an integrity check on the database? If so, there’s your formula.
July 15, 2013 at 1:48 pm
Oh right – I’d forgotten that Adams’ first few Adventures were originally in BASIC (even though you’ve dutifully documented that fact in your blog). I had envisioned those early hackers having only the database files and machine code executables to work from. On the other hand, that could still have been the case, since by late 1979 all these games were being released in machine language. On the other other hand, I suppose there were such things as disassemblers even then…
So why was the checksum value dubbed an “unknown magic number” by those later hackers (Alan Cox and P. D. Doherty if I’m not mistaken)? Perhaps they were working from an even later version of the interpreter that didn’t have the checksum verification in place.
July 16, 2013 at 5:33 am
I don’t think it would have been difficult to get hold of the original BASIC versions. Adams even published his BASIC interpreter source twice as listings in magazines, in the July 1980 SoftSide and the December 1980 Byte. Granted, these articles both appeared somewhat later than the initial text file I found, but I think it does show that no one, including Adams, regarded all this as too tightly held of a secret.
November 7, 2015 at 3:02 pm
I apologize for the late comment, but perhaps there’s value in it for the historical record. :)
I’m in the process of converting the Byte interpreter to Perl at the moment (just to see if i can do it).
The data file and interpreter (version 4.6) in Byte does not include the “checksum”. The SoftSide version of the interpreter is listed as version 4.2 and doesn’t include the checksum calculation either. Perhaps this was a later addition? It would be interesting to get hold of the original 1978 all-uppercase TRS-80 Basic Adventureland for comparison.
OCR:ed and hand-corrected version of the TRS-80 Basic code in plain text (with possible small errors present):
September 5, 2013 at 6:48 am
September 5, 2013 at 7:11 am
Thanks! Always thrilled to hear from the people I write about — especially when they approve. :)
March 6, 2018 at 5:37 pm
You know, I’ve always found it odd that you never replied to Steve Meretsky’s (admittedly rather gnomic) comment on your Sorcerer article. Seems so out of character.
March 7, 2018 at 8:49 am
That would only encourage him. ;)
October 30, 2013 at 8:54 pm
I got into The Quill very late (relatively) in 1990 – I was 13. Without a doubt it is the number one reason I am still involved in programming to this day. The revalation that it was a programming framework only struck me many years later. I wrote to Gilsoft at the time to ask them would they like to play test my games and I got back a very nice handwritten letter encouraging me to keep making games but that it was impractical for them to play test anything! I remember thinking at the time that’s how a company is run. Many happy days spent messing around with the Quill and reading Tim Kemp’s Zenobi reviews in Your Sinclair. Check out Jason Scott’s Get Lamp documentary for a great of text adventures from a US point of view.
September 1, 2014 at 9:34 pm
I was using the QUILL. I was probably ten. The QUILL and the ILLUSTRATOR were the only programmes I ever purchased – New Zealand is a long long way away by snail mail and money orders. Especially when it took six months to save the money doing paper runs!
June 17, 2016 at 1:06 am
Are there any sites or archived info about how to best use The Quill or any of the other adventure creators. I don’t remember any of the magazines having articles but I don’t claim to have seen them all. I’m just wondering with all these Quilled games being produced, was everyone just working alone and each re-inventing the wheel?
June 28, 2016 at 1:27 pm
Dunno if you’re interested but…
T.A.B. is my text adventure creator; interactive fiction project for Windows XP/Vista/7/8 and above platform.
T.A.B. is a kind of quill/paw replicant or variant for WINDOWS.
August 30, 2016 at 9:30 pm
I remember the conversation a little differently; Graeme did not believe there would be a wide market for an editor itself, he was really interested in a simplification of writing the games – it took some effort to persuade him to make something for the average user not a programmer… Interesting reading about the Moluf and Hanson work as I was unaware of that until today. Ironic really as the first commercial code I wrote was for one of our school teachers on his TRS-80 so that he could run the kid’s CESIL programs quickly instead of waiting for the mainframe batch output to come back – when we setup Gilsoft we published a version of it for the Spectrum which was in the early adverts.
January 19, 2017 at 11:25 am
I was one of the handful of people that bought Adventure Writer in the States (actually, I believe it was a Christmas gift). I still have the manual somewhere…
I created a couple of admittedly-terrible games with it, and my 12 year old self was supremely disappointed when I received rejection letters from Compute!’s Gazette after submitting them for consideration. Because of course they’re going to publish 48K worth of MLX code; particularly given the very low quality contained within! Ah, youth.
June 30, 2017 at 10:27 am
There is an interesting site about the QUILL and PAW utes here:
There’s a new release for the C64 after 30 years available for download and there is a new 4-word parser too!
In this article Tim Gilberts reminisces about the “early days”:
September 1, 2018 at 10:24 pm
Great blog, outstanding articles. The best I.T. history blog i’ve ever read.
One correction for this article:
The language presented in figure/picture 3 (last screen print at bottom right) is NOT Czech. It’s Slovenian language. Slovenia is located in central EU, south neighbour of Austria and east neighbour of Italy.
Yep, we’ve had a lot of Quilled adventures, but as far as i can remember, all the commercial ones were quite heavy modified iin assembly code. We even developed our own tool for adding graphics instead of The Illustrator. It was called piXasso.
Can i ask you where did you get that screen of that Slovenian adventure?
September 2, 2018 at 12:06 pm
Thanks for this!
It appears I took it from the screenshots found on World of Spectrum, but I’m having trouble locating it again. (It was probably mislabeled there as Czech.) Sorry… my note-taking in the early days wasn’t as complete as it is today.
August 28, 2020 at 11:06 am
Wait, you corrected it from Czech to… Slovak? It’s Slovenian language, not Slovak. Although, I admit that Slovenia and Slovakia really sound similar, it should still be corrected.
August 28, 2020 at 11:11 am
Fair enough. Thanks!
August 6, 2020 at 2:56 pm
Just a heads up, although I’m not scheduled to write about it for a few months still — the Bruce Hansen system was being advertised as early as December 1981. Combined with magazine lag, the dating should be late 1981, not early 1982.
August 7, 2020 at 7:59 am
October 23, 2020 at 12:26 pm
Interesting article about Czech interactive fiction (featuring… Indiana Jones!?).
January 13, 2021 at 5:27 pm
Another great post. Thank you.
I think: “To some extent this is problem with any authoring system;”
is supposed to read: “To some extent this is a problem with any authoring system;”
and: “the mostly widely used development system today.”
is supposed to read: “the most widely used development system today,”
January 17, 2021 at 10:11 am
February 20, 2021 at 9:39 pm
Yaendle -> Yeandle
February 23, 2021 at 8:11 am
March 6, 2021 at 4:17 pm
Really interesting post, thank you.
All the World of Spectrum links are broken, though. (Not a shocker, however, since WoS has become a much prettier but much much less usable/informative site in the last year or so.)
March 9, 2021 at 8:33 am
Replaced the links with their archived version. Thanks!
November 9, 2021 at 6:58 am
There are some instances of GilSoft and some (if not most of them) of Gilsoft in this article.
Also, I was surprised that you didn’t show-and-tell two or three Quilled gems for the blog in keeping with earlier articles. That would have been quite interesting to me but I guess it would have involved some rather exhaustive research?
November 11, 2021 at 3:23 pm
Thanks! Eight and a half years on, I’m afraid I have no idea why this article ended up as it did. ;)
November 12, 2021 at 4:42 pm
June 5, 2022 at 7:43 pm
“By 1981 they had written the Adventure Executor …”
I don’t think it was ever called “Adventure Executor”. Looking at historical sources, the package is described as ADVEDIT and the TRS-80 catalogs list the following:
* Adventure Editor for Model I (/BAS) – Bruce Hansen & Alan Molluf/The Alternate Source (1982)
* Adventure Editor for Model I (/BAS) – Allan Molluf (1980)
* Adventure Editor for Model III (/BAS) – Allan Molluf (1980)
It looks like there was an Adventure Executor but provided by Adventure International itself. (See the catalog listing at https://www.trs-80.com/search-process-software.php?id=adamsadventures.)
“…the small print that demanded a $200 license fee to use The Adventure System to create commercial adventures.”
I can’t find any reference to a $200 license fee in any of the historical material I have but I could be missing something. If that were truly the case, I would be surprised if Adams’ hadn’t tried to do something about it since that would be a significant bit of revenue for what he might have considered “his” engine, particularly since his company was also providing an engine of sorts.
October 12, 2022 at 8:48 pm
For the last weeks I have been reading your posts chronologically in ebook format and, once arriving to this entry, I have decided to comment. I don’t know if you have researched this (or if it will be shown later) but, if that is not the case, I guess that maybe it can be of your interest.
During the eighties in Spain the genre of Interactive fiction or “Aventuras conversacionales” (Conversational Adventures as we called them) was very popular.
From the start of Dinamic (https://worldofspectrum.org/archive/publishers/Dinamic-Software), maybe the biggest Spanish developer for the 8 bits machines, started with one of this games: Yenght (https://worldofspectrum.org/archive/software/text-adventures/yenght-dinamic-software).
They even translated PAW to our language in 1986 and in 87 published a Quixote adventure, and in 88 a Star Wars parody; “La guerra de las vajillas” (Tableware Wars).
In 1989 they created a dedicated sub-label called “Aventuras AD” (https://worldofspectrum.org/archive/publishers/Aventuras-AD-SA), that started with a new version of “Adventure” with “La aventura original” (The original adventure).
Andrés Samudio, the person behind this project, had a regular column in MicroHobby, the best selling Spectrum magazine published those days.
Here we have two books dedicated to this publisher, but, as the games about I am writing, I guess any of them are published in English.
Beyond Dinamic other Spanish companies published some ID (It comes to my mind “Ke rulen los petas”, a Cyberpunk adventure which name could be translated to something like “Let the pills move around”), but the rest of the Spanish industry didn’t give much attention to that genre.
October 13, 2022 at 6:57 am
Many years ago now, when I was editor of the old SPAG magazine, I devoted much of an issue to Spanish interactive fiction: http://www.spagmag.org/archives/backissues/spag49.html.