The Outcast box was styled to look like a movie poster. Riffing on the same theme, Infogrames’s head Bruno Bonnell called it “the first videogame that really tries to be an interactive movie,” leaving one to wonder whether he had somehow missed the first nine years of the 1990s, during which countless games tried desperately to be just that. Ironically, Outcast actually has very few of the characteristics that had become associated with the phrase: no rigidly linear plot, no digitized human actors, no out-of-engine cutscenes after the obligatory opening one. It’s a game rather than a movie through and through, and all the better for it.
As longtime readers of these histories know already, I’ve never been overly enamored with the so-called “French Touch” in vintage computer games, that blending of elevated aesthetic and thematic aspirations — some might prefer to use the word “pretensions” — with a, shall we say, less thoroughgoing commitment to the details of gameplay and mechanics. So, I approached Outcast, a 1999 game by the Francophone Belgian studio Appeal, with my prejudices held out in front of me like a shield. The descriptions I read of Outcast were full of things that set my spider sense tingling: a blending of wildly divergent, usually mutually exclusive gameplay genres (it’s hard enough to get one type of game right, much less multiple types); a relentlessly diegetic interface that embraces even such typically meta-activities as saving state (it’s hard enough to get an interface right without also trying to extend it into the world of the game); a fiendishly and seemingly needlessly convoluted premise (whereas bad Anglophone games make Donald Duck seem like Shakespeare, bad French ones all seem to be trying to be Victor Hugo and Marcel Proust rolled into one). In fact, I did my level best to avoid writing about Outcast at all, even though I knew it to be one of the better remembered cult classics of the millennial era. But when my reader Deckard asked me to cover it with “big pleading puss-in-boots eyes,” I felt like I owed it to him and all of you to at least give it a look.
Well, then, there’s no point in burying the lede any deeper than I already have: I did play Outcast. Much to my own surprise, I wound up playing it all the way through, and kind of loving it. By no means was I left without nitpicks and niggles, but on the whole it proved to be not just one of the more interesting games I’ve encountered recently but one of the more fun as well. It succeeds on most of the divergent vectors it dares to venture down, delivering a unique, evocative, even moving experience that I won’t soon forget. I owe Deckard a hearty thank you for giving me the push I needed. Read on to find out all the reasons I have to be grateful, plus a little something about where Outcast came from.
Yves Grolet, Yann Robert, and Franck Sauer.
At bottom, Outcast was a labor of love by three fast friends who had been working and playing together for years by the time they started to make it. One of the trio, named Franck Sauer, was a visual artist, sound designer, and rudimentary musician, while the other two, named Yves Grolet and Yann Robert, were accomplished programmers who specialized in high-performance graphics. When they were first coming up in the industry, the Commodore Amiga was still Europe’s premier gaming platform. They first made a reputation for themselves via two audiovisually innovative, mechanically rote shoot-em-ups of the sort that were a dime a dozen on the Amiga at the time: 1990’s Unreal (no, not that one) and 1992’s Agony. Each sold around 20,000 copies in a crowded market.
Worried about the Amiga’s long-term future as a platform — and justifiably so, as it would turn out — the friends then decided to look elsewhere. They applied and were approved for a business-development grant from the government of France — this was made possible by the fact that Yann Robert was a citizen of that country rather than Belgium — and embarked on an ambitious plan to make standup-arcade games, a branch of the industry that was enjoying its last flash of rude health before the unceasing evolution of digital technology for the home rendered it moot. Art & Magic, as they called their company, succeeded in shipping four such games during 1993 and 1994; the actual hardware was manufactured by a Belgian firm known as Deltatec. The first of their games, Ultimate Tennis, performed the best, with some 5000 cabinets sold. Those that followed did steadily less well, and soon the friends decided to jump ship from the softening arcade market just as they had from the Amiga.
Determined to continue making games despite the lukewarm financial rewards their efforts thus far had yielded, they started another company, which they called Appeal, and considered where to go next. With DOOM having recently swept the world, 3D graphics were all the rage in gaming circles. Unconvinced that they could compete head-on with John Carmack and the other talented programmers at id Software, who were already hard at work on Quake, Grolet and Robert opted to try something different on the same Intel-based personal computers that id was targeting. Instead of embracing polygonal 3D rendering, as id and everyone else were doing, they thought to make an engine powered by voxels: essentially, individual pixels that each came complete with an X, Y, and Z coordinate to place it in a 3D space independently, untethered to any polygons. The approach had its limitations — it was less efficient than polygonal graphics in many applications, and far less amenable to hardware acceleration — but it had some notable advantages as well. In particular, it ought to be good at rendering large, open, sun-drenched landscapes, something that the polygonal engines all struggled with. Whereas they favored symmetrical straight lines that were best suited for buildings and other human-made scenery, voxels could do a credible job of rendering the more chaotic, convex splendors of nature.
The friends made a trip to France to pitch the game they called Outcast to the two biggest publishers in Francophone gaming, the Paris-based Ubisoft and the Lyon-based Infogrames. The former turned them down flat; the latter agreed to buy a minority stake in Appeal and to fund the project after just a few days of talks. Grolet, Robert, and Sauer set up shop in the Belgian town of Namur and embarked upon what would turn into a four-year odyssey, alongside a development team that would grow to about twenty people at its peak.
Outcast was created in this nifty-looking building in Namur, above a ground floor of shops.
In the beginning, Outcast was a project driven almost exclusively by its graphics technology, just like everything else the friends had done prior to it. To whatever extent they thought about the gameplay and the fiction, it was as a way to showcase the potential of voxel graphics to best effect. That meant large outdoor spaces to set it apart from the DOOMs and Quakes of the world. The first draft of the plot took place in the jungles of South America, casting the player as a vigilante who goes to war with a gang of drug smugglers. But the friends soon concluded that an alien environment would be better, in that it would show off the visuals without drawing attention to the many ways they could fail to deliver an accurate rendering of the flora and fauna of our own planet; voxels were better at impressionism than photo-realism. Then someone had the idea that, if one outdoor environment would be good, a collection of them to hop among, each with its own aesthetic personality, would be even better. For a good two years, the fiction and the gameplay failed to advance much farther than that, while Appeal worked on their tech and built out the environments in which the game would take place.
There was a danger in letting any such technology-first project drag on for so long, in that consumer-computing hardware in the second half of the 1990s was very much a moving target. When work on Outcast began, most games were still running under MS-DOS, using unaccelerated VGA graphics running at a typical resolution of 320 X 200. The next few years would see Windows 95 and its DirectX libraries finally replace the MS-DOS command line that had been so familiar to gamers for so long, even as SVGA graphics running at a resolution of 640 X 480 or higher became the norm and 3D graphics accelerators became commonplace. Appeal had to reckon with and adjust to these sweeping changes as best they could. They made the switch to Windows, but their voxels were not able to make use of 3D-acceleration cards. In order to keep frame rates reasonable, they had to settle for the rather odd resolution of 512 X 384, a middle ground between the past and present of computer-game graphics.
Outcast’s graphics weren’t terribly impressive in the numeric terms by which such things were usually judged: resolution, texture density, etc. Yet they have an impressionistic beauty all their own. After living with the dark, rather sterile graphics that dominated at the time, booting up Outcast was like opening the curtains in a dark room to let in the light of a gorgeous summer day.
From about the halfway point in its development, Outcast began to expand its horizons, to become something much more than just another graphical showcase. This was accompanied by the arrival of some new characters from outside the somewhat insular world of French gaming. They would come to have an enormous impact on the finished product.
Alongside their French artiness, the core trio were possessed of a huge fondness for big-budget American action movies and their typically bombastic scores. Franck Sauer especially wanted Outcast to have a bold, striking soundtrack to accompany its unique visuals; he cited John Williams, Alan Silvestri, and Danny Elfman as appropriate points of departure. Knowing that such a feat of composition was well beyond his own modest musical talents, he placed an advertisement in some American film-industry magazines, and eventually settled on a Hollywood-based composer named Lennie Moore. Moore was given permission just to go for it. The music he came up with was sometimes wildly, almost comically over the top — he names the pull-out-all-the-stops operas of Richard Wagner as one of his most important influences — but it was like nothing else that had been heard in a game before.
Best of all, Moore happened to have a relationship with the Moscow Symphony Orchestra. The peculiar economics of post-Soviet Russia, where institutions like the aforementioned orchestra had been cast adrift without the state patronage under which they had thrived in previous decades, meant that they were often willing to take on “low-culture” music like videogame scores that no similarly credentialed Western cultural standard bearer would have touched, for a price it would never have countenanced. So, Lennie Moore and Franck Sauer found themselves traveling to Moscow in the summer of 1997, to spend a week recording the soundtrack with an 81-piece orchestra and a 24-member vocal choir, conducted by another American named William Stromberg. Sitting in an empty auditorium listening to the music being performed for the benefit of the tape recorders, Sauer could hardly believe his ears; he still calls it “an experience of a lifetime.”
The Moscow Symphony Orchestra arrives to record the Outcast soundtrack.
Outcast was suddenly taking on a decidedly multinational personality. Indeed, Moore’s score made use of a variety of exotic instrumentation in addition to the orchestra and choir, such as an Armenian duduk, Indian tablas, and African congas. The choir sang passages from Virgil’s Aeneid in the original Latin.
Around the same time that Lennie Moore and William Stromberg came onboard, Appeal hired yet another American, a writer and game designer by the name of Douglas Freese who would spend the next two years with them in Belgium. His assignment was to come up with an overarching plot to join together the six disparate voxel-driven environments that had already been created, and then to write all of the dialog for the many characters the player would encounter there. For it had been decided that Outcast would be, despite its Francophone origins, an English-language production first and foremost, one that could then be localized back into French and other languages as necessary. Writing from my own selfish standpoint as a native English speaker who prefers to play games in that language, this strikes me as a pivotal decision. It means that the Outcast which I know isn’t afflicted with the layer of obfuscation that tends to make playing even well-translated games — to say nothing of the bad translations! — like peering at their worlds through a window coated with a thin rime of frost.
Is the story of Outcast a good story? That depends on how you look at it. In the broadest strokes, it’s both clichéd and convoluted. You play a former Navy SEAL by the name of Cutter Slade — has there ever been a more perfect action-hero name in the history of media? — who is part of the first team of Earthlings ever to use a newly invented piece of mad-scientist kit that enables one to visit a parallel universe. (The influence of Stargate SG-1, a very popular television show at the time, is strong with this one.) But this is no casual research trip for the team: a black hole has been created in our own dimension by an unmanned probe that was sent previously into the alternate one. The rift can be closed only by locating the probe and returning it to the dimension where it belongs.
Your alter ego Cutter Slade. While the backgrounds are rendered using voxels, foreground characters and objects are rendered using more traditional polygons. Even here, however, Appeal found a way to be innovative. The game was one of the first, if not the first, to use a texture-mapping technique called bump-mapping to render action-hero musculature.
Alas, something goes haywire on your trip between dimensions as well, and the four members of your team arrive on the world of Adelpha at widely scattered points in not just geography but also time, with their equipment — including Cutter Slade’s action-hero arsenal of advanced weaponry — likewise scattered hither and yon. And so the game proper begins. In the role of Cutter, all you really want to do is locate your three companions, locate the probe, and return along with them and it to your home dimension, but it turns out that in order to do that you have to defeat a dictator who has taken over Adelpha and is suppressing its alien inhabitants with standard dictatorial glee. This is the task to which you’ll find yourself devoting the vast majority of your time and energy.
As I already noted, this story is as contrived as any in the videogame space, not to mention riddled with plot holes bigger than the inter-dimensional rift itself. (If the probe is such a problem for the stability of the multiverse, why doesn’t the other Earth equipment that’s been scattered everywhere on Adelpha seem to be any cause for concern?) The saving grace is in the details. Cutter Slade at first seems like just another one of the musclebound onscreen ciphers in which Arnold Schwarzenegger once specialized, but, once you get to know him, he turns out to conform more to the Bruce Willis or Harrison Ford archetype. (The voice actor who plays Cutter in the French localization is actually the same one who dubbed over Willis’s voice in the French Die Hard.) He’s always quick with a quip, expressing appropriate exasperation every time he’s given Yet Another Fetch Quest to carry out by one of the huge number of characters who inhabit the six regions of Adelpha, but he’s a soft touch at heart. He proves to be good company for his player, thus fulfilling the first and most important requirement for any videogame avatar. He’s so likable that you really want to bring his story to a happy ending.
Cutter Slade is a fish out of water much but not all of the time on Adelpha: being a former Navy SEAL, he’s pretty good at swimming as well as running, crawling, hitting, and shooting. “As far as Cutter is concerned, I had an easy time with his dialog because we both were in alien lands — him Adelpha, me Belgium — and we both had something to accomplish,” says Douglas Freese.
You can move from one of the six wildly disparate regions of Adelpha to another one only via the teleportation portals you find scattered about. The first region is a small training area, but the others are sprawling open spaces that show off the capabilities of the voxel engine to maximum advantage. Your main goal in each is to find a MacGuffin called a “mon,” of which you need all five in order to liberate the planet. But getting each mon will require working your way through a whole matrix of puzzles and other, preliminary quests given to you by the local inhabitants, members of a humanoid species known as the Talan. Most of the quests are self-contained within each region, but every once in a while the game switches it up and demands that you do something in another region to meet a local challenge. The whole design is impressively nonlinear; you can go almost everywhere right from the start, can tackle the regions in any order you wish. A short time after you find a mon, the game fires off a larger plot event involving your search for your missing teammates and sends you scurrying off to put out a fire somewhere and learn some more about What Is Really Going On on Adelpha. In this way, Outcast manages to balance a high degree of player freedom with a more conventional plot, with a coherent beginning, middle, and end.
The Talan are the most shiftless bunch of aliens ever. Some of them explain that they’re pacifists who cannot possibly shed blood themselves, yet they’re perfectly okay with you doing the blood-shedding for them. (Certain parallels from the real world of 2025 inevitably leap to mind, but it’s probably best if I don’t point them out here.)
Solving the many and diverse problems afflicting Cutter and his new Talan friends often entails combat; this is where the other, less cerebral side of the game’s identity comes to the fore. You can fight either from a third-person, behind-the-back perspective, Tomb Raider style, or from a first-person perspective, Quake style. Either way, you have half a dozen different weapons to experiment with — assuming you can find them and keep them fed with ammunition — and always have your sturdy action-hero fists available as a fallback option.
I found the combat in Outcast to be a blast — literally so, in the case of one of my favorite weapons, a handheld grenade launcher that makes as enjoyable an explosion as I’ve ever encountered in a game. By no means is it entirely free of jank — I had a persistent issue with getting hung up behind the bodies of my fallen enemies, whom Cutter’s SEAL training has apparently not taught him to step over — yet it seldom failed to put a smile on my face. One of the most satisfying tactics is to forgo weapons and just run up and beat the snot out of the evil Talan soldiers, Three Stooges style — one hand holding your victim by the collar, the other whaling away on his face. (For extra fun, use the one you’re beating up as a meat shield against the ones who are shooting at you.) I have to give special props to the artificial intelligence of your opponents, who do a remarkably effective job of coordinating with one another in a firefight, who are even capable of luring you into deadly ambushes if you aren’t careful.
As most of you know, this style of gameplay isn’t usually in my wheelhouse. Yet I had more genuine fun with Outcast than with any action game I’ve played for these histories since Jedi Knight. Just as is the case with that game, Outcast is full of big explosions and flying bodies, but it never gets morbid about it: there’s no blood to be seen, and corpses simply disappear after a few minutes in a puff of energy. (There’s probably some in-story explanation for that, but who can be bothered to look it up?) Meanwhile the difficulty is pitched perfectly for me, occasionally challenging but never crazily punishing, rewarding smart tactics as much or more than fast reflexes.
The eternal videogame pleasure of making stuff go boom…
While it’s very easy for a review like this one to slip into talking about Outcast as a game of two halves, it doesn’t really feel that way in practice. One of its most amazing achievements is how seamless it is to play; one never gets the feeling of shifting from “adventure mode” to “shooter mode,” as one tends to do in so many cross-genre exercises. Everything takes place within the same interface, and everything you do is connected to everything else. There are plenty of dialog puzzles and object-oriented puzzles of the sort you might find in an adventure game, but there are also some physics-based puzzles that wouldn’t have been possible in a point-and-click engine: shoot a pendulum at just the right point in its sway to make it move faster and faster, drop a bomb perfectly into the bottom of a well. Solving a fetch quest might require you to fight or sneak your way past some soldiers to get what you need; then, in turn, the outcome of the quest might be to weaken the enemies you fight later by taking away some of their food supply or reducing the power of their weapons. Most of your enemies do not respawn. This means that, if you invest a lot of time and effort into cleaning up a region, it generally stays that way. Adelpha is a truly reactive world that allows for considerable variance in play styles. You can flat-out go to war on behalf of its oppressed peoples, or you can sneak around, resorting to violence only when absolutely necessary. It’s entirely up to you.
The commitment to verisimilitude in all things led the designers to attempt to provide diegetic explanations for even Outcast’s gamiest aspects. The fact that the Talan you meet are all males — presumably a byproduct of a limited voice-acting budget in the real world — is here the result of a segregated alien society, in which women and children live in a separate enclave except during mating season, when everyone comes together to get their grooves on. The fact that the Talan all know how to speak English is explained as… ah, that would be spoiling things. Moving back onto safer territory, it’s studiously related in the manual that Cutter Slade carries a “miniaturization backpack” around with him, thus explaining why it is that he can hold an infinite quantity of stuff in his inventory. The onscreen HUD as well is explained as merely the view through the “direct bio-neural interface” which Cutter wears at all times.
Of course, this sort of thing can quickly get silly: if the above hasn’t convinced you of that already, the in-game “Gaamsaav” (groan!) crystal that lets Cutter capture a snapshot in time surely will. On the other hand, even it is cleverer in design terms than it first appears. Cutter has to stand still for several seconds in order to use it, which makes it inadvisable to pull out in the middle of a firefight. In this way, Outcast deftly heads off the overuse of a save function which can rob all of the tension out of a game, without annoying and inconveniencing the player too unduly through more draconian remedies like fixed save points.
As this example illustrates, Outcast provides more than just an unusually reactive and thoughtfully realized world: it also succeeds really well as an exercise in playable game design. This is not to say that fomenting a revolution on Adelpha is easy; there is little hand-holding in this wide-open world beyond a useful if sometimes cryptic quest log. Yet the game is never unfair either. If you explore diligently and follow up on all of the information you’re given, it’s perfectly soluble. I got through it without a single hint, although it did take me a few weeks of evenings and weekend afternoons to do so. The mere fact that I was motivated enough to put in the time says a lot. I had the feeling throughout that this was a game that had been played by lots of people before it was released, that it earnestly wanted to be played and enjoyed by me now, that it was a game whose designers had thought deeply about the player’s experience. What might first seem like an aggressively uncompromising game proves to be full of thoughtful little affordances for the player who deigns to pay careful attention to what’s going on, such as the portable transporter devices that you can use to jump around to arbitrary points within a region and the handy lexicon of unfamiliar alien phrases that is automatically compiled for you as you talk to more and more Talan. It isn’t even necessary to finish all of the quests in order to finish Outcast; much of the content is optional.
Exploring Cutter’s inventory.
I’ve expended a fair number of words on Outcast by now, but I’m not sure I’ve succeeded in capturing the sui generis quality that makes it so memorable. Needless to say, no game arises in a vacuum, and we can definitely find precedents for and possible influences upon this one if we look for them. Most obviously, it can be slotted into the long and proud European tradition of open-world action-adventures, dating back to 1980s classics like Mercenary and Exile. Then, too, it’s not hard to detect a whiff of Tomb Raider’s influence in its behind-the-back perspective and its occasional jumping puzzles. Outcast’s unflagging commitment to verisimilitude and diegesis brings to mind Looking Glass’s brilliant System Shock. The fetch quests might have come out of an Ultima game, some of the puzzles out of Myst. Yet Outcast blends it all in such a seamless way that it ends up entirely its own thing. It is, if you’ll forgive the cliché, more than the sum of its incredibly disparate parts. It shouldn’t work, but it does. It’s interactive narrative at its purest, in which the gameplay exists to serve the story and the world rather than the other way around.
“Outcast is a game made with passion, with no constraints of being tied to a particular genre or to please a particular group of people,” says Franck Sauer. “We just did the game we wanted to make, and that was it.” The end result is as groundbreaking and inspiring an attempt to make an action game where the action feels like it matters as is Half-Life. Indeed, if we’re being honest, I had a heck of a lot more fun with Outcast than I ever did with Half-Life. Personally, I’ll take the chatty and funny Cutter Slade over Gordan Freeman the stoic cipher any day.
Despite all of Appeal’s efforts to give Outcast appeal across the Atlantic Ocean by making it an English-first production, and despite a significant Stateside advertising campaign, it proved a hard sell in an American market where successful games were by now largely confined to a handful of hard-and-fast genres. It sold only about 50,000 copies in the United States after its release in the summer of 1999. Thankfully, it did considerably better in Europe, where it sold 350,000 copies. Combined with a relatively low final production bill — Sauer estimates that Appeal brought the whole game in for about €1.5 million, even with the cost of hiring an entire symphony orchestra and choir for a week — this total was enough to place the game right on the bubble between commercial failure and success.
After dithering for a while, Infogrames agreed to fund a sequel, on the condition that Appeal would make a version for the Sony PlayStation 2 as well as for personal computers, with more action and less adventure. That project muddled along for a little over a year, only to be cancelled by the publisher in 2001 as part of a program of corporate retrenching. Appeal shut down soon after, and that seemed to be that for Outcast.
Yet the game retained a warm place in the hearts of the three friends who had originally conceived it, as it did in those of a small but committed cult of fans, some of whom discovered it on abandonware sites only years after its release. Franck Sauer, Yves Grolet, and Yann Robert were eventually able to win back the rights to the game from their old publisher. In 2014, they made a lightly remastered version called Outcast 1.1; in 2017, they made a full-fledged remake called Outcast: Second Contact; in 2024, there came the long-delayed sequel, Outcast: A New Beginning. Being stuck in the ludic past as I am, I haven’t played any of these, but all have been fairly well-received by reviewers. Kudos to the creators and the fans for refusing to let a very special game die.
As for me, I’ll try to keep Outcast in mind the next time I’m tempted to pass judgment on a game without giving it an honest try. For games, like people, deserve to be judged on their own merits, not on the basis of their peer group.
Did you enjoy this article? If so, please think about pitching in to help me make many more like it. You can pledge any amount you like.
Sources: The books Principals of Three-Dimensional Computer Animation (3rd ed.) by Michael O’Rourke and Outcast: Prima’s Official Strategy Guide by Joel Durham, Jr.; Computer Gaming World of November 1999; PC Format Gold of Winter 1997; PC Gamer of November 1997 and April 1998; Next Generation of January 1998; PC Games of December 1998.
Online sources include the old official Outcast site, an old unofficial Outcast fan site, a presentation given by the Appeal principals on Outcast’s graphics technology and aesthetics, a vintage “making of” documentary produced by Infogrames, an Adventure Classic Gaming interview with Doug Freese, a Game-OST interview with Lennie Moore, and a capsule biography of William Stromberg at Tribute Film Classics. Most of all, I drew from Franck Sauer’s home page, which is full of detailed stories and images from his long career in game development.
Where to Get It: There are two versions of Outcast available for digital purchase: the remastered Outcast 1.1 and the remade Outcast: Second Contact. If you buy the former, you gain access to the original 1999 version of the game — the one that I played for this article — as a “bonus goodie.” Should you decide to play this version, do note that it’s afflicted by one ugly glitch on newer machines, involving the lighthouse in the region of Okasankaar. (Strictly speaking, you don’t absolutely have to solve this puzzle to finish the game, but doing so does make it easier.) Your best bet is to make momentary use of the cheat mode when you find yourself needing to repair the lighthouse in a way that Lara Croft might approve of. On my computer at least, every other part of the game worked fine, the occasional bit of random graphical jank excepted.
David Boddie
September 19, 2025 at 5:38 pm
I think I first read about Outcast in Edge magazine, probably issue 59, and it sounded enough like a 3D version of Exile to get me interested. Unfortunately, I was equipped with the wrong hardware to play it and wouldn’t have had the free time to do so, anyway. I kind of lost track of it during development, so it’s good to know that it still has its fans and its legacy.
Leo Vellés
September 19, 2025 at 8:46 pm
This must be the first time in the history of this blog (and I’ve read every single entry) that I’ve never heard, saw or read anything about the game that is subject of your analysis
arcanetrivia
September 20, 2025 at 8:14 pm
I don’t think I’ve ever heard of this one before, either.
Alianora La Canta
September 23, 2025 at 7:11 pm
I don’t remember this one either, probably because at the time, the fastest computer in the house was a Pentium 200 (there was also a Pentium 90 and a 486 DX2-66) and none of them had the requisite 32 MB of RAM until the end of 2000 (when we discovered The Sims required it and I got given the necessary extra RAM as a Christmas present). By then, Outcast was on the back half of its original sales cycle, so I can well imagine that there would be an assumption nobody with a flashy enough computer would want such an “old game” any more.
Pity. I think I would have enjoyed this a lot back then. Maybe even now, if I found time for it…
Jack Brounstein
September 19, 2025 at 9:08 pm
I have a process question: To what extent, if at all, do you use recordings like let’s plays or longplays as part of your research? Actually playing the game is incredibly important, of course, but I wonder you use the recordings to either A) view secrets or endings of games that are beyond your patience or B) help separate the wheat from the chaff when choosing games to cover, to get a first sense of what a game might be like before firing it up yourself?
Jimmy Maher
September 20, 2025 at 8:19 am
I won’t lie: YouTube is a great cheat sheet which I make regular use of.
That said, I don’t tend to use it to decide which games to cover. I find that very few YouTubers are interested in taking it slow and carefully explaining the mechanics of a game. They’re mostly people who are already very familiar with the game they’re playing. So, if you don’t have some level of familiarity yourself, it just turns into a kind of incomprehensible blur. That’s how it is for me, anyway. Others might be quicker on the uptake. ;) Personally, though, I find written reviews, both vintage and contemporary, to be a better way of deciding what I want to play. And I can scan a chunk of text a lot more quickly than I can watch a linear video stream.
YouTube does come in super handy for two other purpose. One is for getting an impression of games that I pretty much know I don’t want to play. Such games never become the main subject of their own feature articles, but they often show up in more generalized surveys, state-of-the-industry pieces, etc.
And the other is, exactly as you suspected, to check out endings and late games of titles I’ve already experimented with on my own. One “problem” I’ve had as I’ve moved forward in time is that the games have become bigger, more complex, and thus more time-consuming. There just isn’t enough time to for me to play to completion all of the games I cover in some detail here — at least not without dramatically exceeding the amount of time that’s good for me to spend playing, at the expense of all of the other aspects of my life. So, I sometimes have to make some hard choices about how long I stick with a game, by asking whether the benefits of investing more time are really worth it, both in terms of research and personal enjoyment. (The latter remains important too, of course; I’m certainly not doing this job because it’s earning me a fortune). And sometimes the decision is less hard, when I spend a couple of hours with a game and can see that, regardless of its abstract merits, it’s just not for me.
I do try to be transparent about how deep I personally went with a game when I write about it, and to always keep in mind and occasionally point out the difference between personal taste and abstract quality. As I’ve gotten older and perhaps wiser, I’ve tended to frame these articles less as some sort of final critical verdict, and more as histories, analyses, and personal impressions. I’m well aware that my critical judgment is riddled with prejudices and blind spots, and I try to be fair to the games I cover even when they’re not for me. There’s also the interesting phenomenon of games that I don’t really love to play, but that I nevertheless find extremely interesting for what they represent for the evolution of their genre. YouTube can be incredibly helpful with these — although, again, more as a supplement to than a substitute for hands-on experimentation.
Jeff Sampson
September 22, 2025 at 4:13 pm
When it comes to landmark big budget games, the critical path becomes much easier as you move into the future(the dead man walking failed state is a distant relic), there’s much less puzzles, and things in general get streamlined for the obvious need to appeal to more consumers. Knights of The Old Republic was a huge departure from Baldur’s Gate II, and they’re separated by three years.
What’s an easy call to skip is the ridiculous filler in “open-world games”, which even the minimalist by today’s standards GTA III has. Collecting the 100 hidden packages across the city and stealing all the requested types of cars? Hey, fuggetaboutit.
I was rewarded for taking the time to steal a tank in GTA III though, it came in handy on the final mission. But in Vice City, they already started forcing you to use certain vehicles for missions so they could get their desired set piece. The old player freedom versus storytelling battle.
Andrew Pam
September 20, 2025 at 6:25 am
I can recommend the “Outcast: Second Contact” remake for people not committed to playing it with the original low-resolution graphics.
Busca
September 20, 2025 at 6:42 am
Glad to hear you enjoyed the game. Not having played it before, I bought it on GOG quite a while ago (probably during a sale) based on having read good things about it. In line with what you write, it sounded like an intriguing mix of genres mostly pulling said combination off, which is indeed a rare feat and all the more so back in the day. Always interesting to get the development background through your articles.
It’s still on my long backlist, but I’m looking forward to experiencing it myself.
Feldspar
September 20, 2025 at 7:06 am
Never heard of this game, and sounds like a pity that it’s not more well known. Judging by the screenshots here, the terrain and especially water effects look extremely good for a game from 1999. (The Miiverse “nice water” guy that became a meme would have liked it for sure) Looks like their highly specialized engine was working some real magic.
Minor technical quibble, but the type of bump mapping which is used in real-time 3D games is called “normal mapping”.
Jimmy Maher
September 20, 2025 at 7:51 am
I’m far from an expert on such things, but Wikipedia describes normal mapping as “an implementation of bump mapping.” And Franck Sauer mentions only bump mapping in his personal history of Outcast. Wouldn’t the more commonly used umbrella term be acceptable in this not-highly-technical context?
f
September 20, 2025 at 8:54 am
Great write-up, as always. Curious how Outcast is a complete unknown to some – among our group of (European) gaming friends at the time, it was a major hype, in the year or so before it released. I remember it receiving substantial preview coverage in gaming magazines. once it released, we were quite in awe of its presentation (thanks to the one guy with the beefiest PC in our group).
A brief technical tangent re: bump mapping vs normal mapping: the former was an earlier, simpler form of the latter, so to speak.
Bump mapping uses simple greyscale textures to store pure height information (darker parts = lower, brighter parts = higher). It can add detail to the surface of a (low-poly) object by having the realtime lighting respond according to the ‘fake’ elevation described by the bump map. The effect tends to break when used for larger details, though. This is were Normal Maps come in, as they actually store the ‘normal’ (= orientation) information of the suface across three color channels (RGB), and can thus more accurately describe how light will behave when hitting the surface at different angles.
It should also be noted that the illusion both techniques provide will often break once the surfaces are viewed at a shallow enough angle, since neither actually modify the 3D geometry (and thus don’t alter an object’s silhouette).
Sniffnoy
September 20, 2025 at 6:07 pm
I’m confused how either technique was used if the graphics were voxel-based instead of polygon-based. Were voxels just used for the environment and polygons for the characters, or something?
f
September 21, 2025 at 10:32 am
Correct – voxels were used for the terrain, as well as some of the simpler structures, stairs, and parts of some buildings (no overhangs, but e.g. the snowy roofs at the beginni). The rest – characters, props and buildings – were rendered using polygonal models.
f
September 21, 2025 at 10:38 am
(Just looked at a gameplay video – I misremembered slightly, the snowy roofs themselves at the beginning of the game are also polygonal, but the mounds of snow next to the buildings seem to be voxels)
Jimmy Maher
September 21, 2025 at 1:25 pm
I clarified this in the article. Thanks to you both!
Vladimir Kazanov
September 20, 2025 at 8:12 am
Heh…
I remember Outcast really well! That game nobody could play.
All the online 3d tech communities buzzed about it, and everybody wanted to play it, but CPU requirements were just too high for machines most of us kids had in late 90s. While a cheap GPU was already possible to buy for pocket money, a suitable high-end Pentium + enough RAM would be prohibitively expensive: something like $500 just for the latest Pentium III class CPU. And the game really, really sucked at anything below that.
So it sort of became the can-it-run-crysis meme of the day, and nobody gets nostalgic about that.
Maybe this can explain the relative obscurity of a great game?
Jimmy Maher
September 20, 2025 at 8:43 am
Yes, I think it partially could, at least in Europe. In North America, I think that problem wasn’t so much that computers couldn’t run it. The lack of 3D-accelerator support affected its reception in another way: there were quite a few people who wouldn’t buy a game that wasn’t 3D-accelerated on principle, because a) they had invested quite a bit of money in that snazzy graphics card and wanted to use it, and b) they presumed any game that wasn’t accelerated must ispo facto suck in terms of its visuals.
Vince
September 22, 2025 at 6:48 am
I don’t know, I’m pretty sure the time I had a Pentium MMX + 3dfx Voodoo, a good generation behind the state of the art of Pentium II + Voodoo 2, but I don’t remember having any issues in running it.
Vladimir Kazanov
September 22, 2025 at 12:59 pm
I vaguely remember having something like Pentium 120 MHz + Voodoo Banshee, not sure about RAM. I could play Unreal and Half-life on it just fine, and most other games on various settings.
Outcast, on the other hand, barely worked at all no matter how much I tried.
By the way, requirements in the PCGamingWiki (https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Outcast#System_requirements):
mention Pentium MMX 200 MHz as a minimum. So maybe you did have a powerful enough machine?
Vince
September 22, 2025 at 2:17 pm
Yes I believe I had a MMX 233MHz. Powerful enough, but not really a “it can run Crysis” kind of machine, for the time.
Probably in the case of Unreal and Half-Life the 3D card does a lot of the heavy lifting, while for Outcast the CPU was the bottleck.
f
September 23, 2025 at 10:42 am
Yeah- the original release in 1999 did not support any 3D acceleration via GPUs. The software rendering engine is entirely CPU-bound.
The more recent 1.1 re-release implements multi-threaded voxel rendering (among other improvements), which allows the game to take advantage of modern day multi-core CPUs and thereby dramatically increases the framerate the game can be played at.
Mattias Källman
September 20, 2025 at 8:56 am
Great read, as always. I never played Outcast but it got me thinking about some of my own defining moments in gaming. One of these was the first-time I played NovaLogic’s Comanche: Maximum Overkill, a 1992 shoot-em-up disguised as a helicopter flight simulator. The sense of wow was at the same level as when I first played Wing Commander a few years earlier.
It would be interesting to read an overview on the rise (sort of) and fall of voxel-based games in the 1990s where it seemed to look like the inevitable future of computer graphics (which it wasn’t, of course, even NovaLogic abandoned it for Comanche 4 in 2001). That would also make it possible to briefly cover some of the games that are a little out of this chronicle’s main area of interest, and wouldn’t merit a full article by themselves. Just my two cents.
Jimmy Maher
September 20, 2025 at 9:07 am
It’s an interesting idea. I’ll take it under advisement, as they say. ;) If anyone knows of good sources that cover voxel graphics and their differences from polygonal 3D graphics, written at a level suitable for the intelligent non-specialist, feel free to chime in.
Mattias Källman
September 20, 2025 at 1:33 pm
Cool – I started googling it myself after I read the comment, and Kyle Freeman, who created NovaLogic’s voxel engine, could be a good place to start. He’s active on X.
VoxelSpace was seen as pretty revolutionary in its age, and the backstory around medical imaging seems pretty interesting. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voxel_Space
Also, imagine booting this up from 3 3,5″ floppies back in 1992 for the first time. It was like the future had arrived. https://youtu.be/MLcxgYEBAXA?si=zlZGozRGHuEaZ9R4
Frans de Jonge
September 20, 2025 at 2:26 pm
I was trying to find some articles about Delta Force (which I think is where I first recall reading about it), but in the process I came across this wonderful explanation of how Comanche works. It’s probably not relevant to Outcast though.
https://github.com/s-macke/VoxelSpace
The Wargaming Scribe
September 23, 2025 at 11:39 am
Comanche was also a defining moment of my own gaming. In addition to the sheer visual awe (my other point of comparaisons were the Red Baron games and the 1989 M4 Sherman…) it was my first chopper game and I played most of them after that – though as often happened it never equalled the feelings of Comanche (or more specifically Comanche 3, with combined beauty and incredible level design).
I suppose it’s not the host’s cup of tea obviously, but it made me happy to see Comanche mentioned.
Mattias Källman
September 25, 2025 at 8:22 am
And with that, I found another blog to check out!
Mark Williams
September 20, 2025 at 6:29 pm
I loved Outcast! Got as far as the third ‘world’ (not counting the intro level). One of the first really great open world games, with an amazing score and varied gameplay.
Alex
September 21, 2025 at 6:22 am
I was a little bit surprised to find this one here. I can´t speak for other parts of europe, but it received quite a lot of coverage in the german press for a short amount of time. I never played it until recently, but it always stayed in the back of my head. I gave the “remastered” (while the graphics in general and the UI got a modern touch, the character animation and the voice over did not – at least not the german voices) version a try and would recommend it if you are looking for something “different”. The so often mentioned gameworld and the music still deliver something sophisticated that stands out more than twenty years later.
The gameplay itself is a matter of taste and I still have problems to orientate myself without hints on the map, but if you take the time to absorb yourself into the game, it can become quite an experience, best played on a wider screen. On a sidenote, they also used the regional well-known voice actor for Bruce Willis for the main character in the german localization. It doesn´t quite fit for me however, as this character doesn´t look like Willis at all.
Martin
September 22, 2025 at 2:35 pm
I can second that it was definitely a thing in Germany. Didn’t play it at the time, however.
Brent
September 21, 2025 at 11:44 am
Is FF7 badly translated or is the story merely incoherent on its own? Given the blockbuster budget I suspect the latter.
Jimmy Maher
September 21, 2025 at 1:17 pm
Whatever the merits or lack thereof of the Final Fantasy VII story, it is quite famous for its poor translation. Square sat someone down with the complete Japanese script as a series of isolated text snippets, devoid of context, and told him to have at it. Then they released what he provided without a second glance. The end result is awkward at best, completely incomprehensible at worst. For all of Final Fantasy VIII’s well-earned reputation as one of the black sheep of the family, it did at least get a vastly better translation.
Douglas Freese
September 21, 2025 at 1:41 pm
You captured the faults and finesse well. Glad you enjoyed it. It took me two weeks of 16 hours a day writing to get all the dialog done to meet a surprise deadline by Infogrames which for my very first game had me panicking like no one knows. My bedroom looked like the Charlie from It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia crazy conspiracy meme.
Max
September 23, 2025 at 2:13 pm
Thank you for being a part of such awesome game!
GamingHistoriography
September 25, 2025 at 3:20 am
Cool to see you commenting and well done on the game!
Vince
September 22, 2025 at 8:33 am
This was a nice surprise, as even as “cult” classics go I feel this is pretty obscure, especially (as it seems from the comments and sales figures, I was surprised to see how well it did in Europe) for a US audience.
I have not replayed it since release and I confess not remembering much beyond the incredible soundrack, the protagonist’s name (I remember a magazine making fun of it) and the very unusual graphics.
I’ll definitely look up both the remake and the sequel, thanks for the great read as always.
Keith
September 22, 2025 at 5:49 pm
Like others here, I’d never played or even heard of this game before today. Your description of the experience calls to mind a game I did enjoy: Omikron: The Nomad Soul. In that, the player finds themselves on a strange alien planet (starring David Bowie!) and you’re free to just explore and figure out things as you go. I haven’t played since it was released, so who knows how well it aged, but I have a soft spot in my heart for it. All of the David Bowie songs in it are found by the player as in-game concerts/rock videos by a literal band of underground rebels. Thank you for reminding me of a time when developers were still offering these sorts of experiences.
Max
September 22, 2025 at 7:26 pm
I am so glad you played and wrote about this masterpiece, for me, it’s a magical game, unlike any other. It stands on its own, it gave me a feeling of awe I cannot properly describe. More people need to discover it. The Lore around the Talan Words… the history, transmitted to the player orally most of the time, it’s masterful narrative design.
I can’t believe you did not talk about one of the coolest thing about the game: the fact that there is no arrow or markers pointing the way of the player. No handholding. You need directions? Ask any NPC, they will point the way at you… this may seem trivial or even minutia, but man, why no other game has adopted this as default for objective pointing? It’s so diegetic and raw, yet it makes perfect sense.
I really hope you cover The Longest Journey someday. For the time, I will continue reading this awesome blog.
Frans de Jonge
September 24, 2025 at 7:47 am
Doesn’t that just describe old games? If you can indeed ask every single NPC that doesn’t sound like a bad solution for the problem that if you drop a game for a few weeks —or even a few days!— you might not have a clue where your next objective was anymore, but even so I think in Entomorph: Plague of the Darkfall (1995) for example most NPCs would be able to give directions… possibly if you hadn’t strayed too far off course. Also NPCs could die from wildlife if you got there too late so then they’d be gone forever.
Because knowing where to go after a few weeks or months is what location markers are good for. It goes without saying that your character acquired or drew a map even if they didn’t explicitly show it happening on screen. It’s the same as when you stick a little marker on a map yourself, and they also asked the quest giver to point it out. I think that’s much more realistic than bumbling around asking random people for directions constantly because you didn’t have a map. Even if the character didn’t need a map, I need a map to see into their mind for it not to feel unrealistic. “Go to your best friend’s house” followed by searching for an hour all over the city because who’d know where their best friend lives? ;-) Some old games can get away with that because the town only has about five homes.
Alex
September 23, 2025 at 4:30 am
I think he didn´t write about the missing handholding because it just didn´t exist as a design standard until years later.
Deckard
September 24, 2025 at 10:16 am
It took me a few days to stop reeling from the surprise of seeing the title of this article and then even more so from the fact that I was mentioned twice in the opening paragraphs.
Jimmy, thank you so much for reviewing this. Despite my plea I didn’t actually expect anything to come out of it.
I am happy that you liked the game. It’s too good a game, IMHO, to be forgotten.
If it weren’t for your site I would never have played some awesome but old and forgotten games (talking about Ultima Worlds 1 and 2 here) so it’s nice to see that I could return the favour. :)
Busca
September 25, 2025 at 6:32 am
This is actually at least the second time you have been pleasantly surprised by a game made with the ‘French Touch’ and mixing genres – at least as far as I recall your article on Cryo Interactive’s Dune. Another cult classic with a great soundtrack which I enjoyed replaying a couple years back.
It might be in Dune‘s case that was at least partly the result of Virgin’s pressure / conditions, but maybe there are other hidden gems out there, waiting to be (re-)discovered by you if you are willing and able to give them a try – as far as possible within the thematic confines and time constraints of your blog, of course.
Josh Martin
September 26, 2025 at 4:09 pm
Unconvinced that they could compete head-on with John Carmack and the other talented programmers at id Software, who were already hard at work on Quake, Grolet and Robert opted to try something different on the same Intel-based personal computers that id was targeting. Instead of embracing polygonal 3D rendering, as id and everyone else were doing, they thought to make an engine powered by voxels: essentially, individual pixels that each came complete with an X, Y, and Z coordinate to place it in a 3D space independently, untethered to any polygons.
An interesting footnote here is that by the time Quake III came around, Carmack was convinced voxels were the wave of the future and predicted his next polygonal engine would be his last before voxel-based GPUs took over.
It needs to be pointed out, though, that Outcast (like Novalogic’s “Voxel Space” engine before it) cheats a bit: terrain in these games is internally represented as a two-dimensional surface. each point of which is assigned a height. A raycasting algorithm is then used to render this two-dimensional heightmap as an apparently three-dimensional landscape. With a fully voxel-based data structure, the terrain would be built up like a Lego set, including points beneath the surface; this is what makes such structures so resource-intensive (and why Minecraft runs horribly on hardware perfectly capable of handling games that superficially look far more complex). Since the landscape in Outcast is at bottom a two-dimensional surface, its “voxels” have x and y coordinates, but no real z coordinates. The obvious downside is that any given point on the heightmap can only have a single height value, so you can’t normally do things like overhanging terrain or ceilings. Outcast and the later Voxel Space games get around this by simply placing polygonal structures on top of the raycast terrain. To some degree you can compare these engines to Doom and other “2.5D” games, which don’t use heightmaps but still represent their environments as two-dimensional structures with definable height values. This explanation is based on the Voxel Space engine, but from what I can tell Outcast works in largely the same way.